• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

You think people are upset he's not Kane? 😆

I'm upset he's not even Kanoute, Pavlychenko, Defoe or Keane. When I think of Richy criticisms Kane is a like a million miles away. 😂😂😂

Kanoute and Pat were both 1/4 strikers, same as Richie.

Defoe was exceptional finisher, but didn't offer anywhere near as much as Richie defensively.

Robbie was one of the greatest players of his generation and would have walked into any team on the planet, he was special too.
 
Kanoute and Pat were both 1/4 strikers, same as Richie.

Defoe was exceptional finisher, but didn't offer anywhere near as much as Richie defensively.

Robbie was one of the greatest players of his generation and would have walked into any team on the planet, he was special too.
Can't compare Kanoute's all round game to Richi's, Kanoute was a fantastic link man.
 
Kanoute and Pat were both 1/4 strikers, same as Richie.

Defoe was exceptional finisher, but didn't offer anywhere near as much as Richie defensively.

Robbie was one of the greatest players of his generation and would have walked into any team on the planet, he was special too.
The difference is Kanoute was actually good at football and in this team he would massively contribute to our hold up and build up play and with a coach who respects him he was a fantastic striker. Pav had inconsistent touch but again still nicer with the ball more consistently than Richy and his goal per min stats trounce Richy's.
 
Can't compare Kanoute's all round game to Richi's, Kanoute was a fantastic link man.

The difference is Kanoute was actually good at football and in this team he would massively contribute to our hold up and build up play and with a coach who respects him he was a fantastic striker. Pav had inconsistent touch but again still nicer with the ball more consistently than Richy and his goal per min stats trounce Richy's.

All fair points, but I think Richie’s defensive work balances that out and is massively underrated.
 
I love the way that every time Richi has a shocker, Dom is called out as being crap.

Personally, I just want Dom to get a run of games. He is at least a proper number 9.
I don’t think you can play the way RDZ without someone who can hold the ball up
Dom can do that
Richy is bad at that
The players were being linked with IMO are not the players who hold the ball up and do the physical side though and that is a worry for me
 
I love the way that every time Richi has a shocker, Dom is called out as being crap.

Personally, I just want Dom to get a run of games. He is at least a proper number 9.
They are both crap, Dom becomes better and better the longer he is unavailable. By the time he's got and ready people will be expecting prime Benzema. He wasn't impressive in his first season when he was fit and he hasn't been impressive since.
 
They are both crap, Dom becomes better and better the longer he is unavailable. By the time he's got and ready people will be expecting prime Benzema. He wasn't impressive in his first season when he was fit and he hasn't been impressive since.

He came back from injury last season, looked alright for a bit then got worse and worse until he got injured again.
 
He came back from injury last season, looked alright for a bit then got worse and worse until he got injured again.
He only looked good within the context that we had months of suffering with watching Richy game after game. Objectively speaking he was meh and only got worse.
 
He came back from injury last season, looked alright for a bit then got worse and worse until he got injured again.

He would have been patching himself up to play until he got injured again. I doubt he ever felt his body was 100%.

Ultimately, we do need him 100% fit, but if he's going to be one of these that can never achieve that then we should know what to do.
 
The problem we have with him is he cannot control a ball very well and his hold up play is shocking. when his back is to goal no one is scared of what he can do. There was 1 moment yesterday where we played some decent one touch stuff and it came to him, you could see it was clearly a poor touch but it ended up falling to our player. The commentator mentioned how that was much better from Spurs and that it was some good one touch stuff. He is shocking, i'd love to play against Richie as a CB knowing the tactics are to get it into him back to goal.
 
The problem we have with him is he cannot control a ball very well and his hold up play is shocking. when his back is to goal no one is scared of what he can do. There was 1 moment yesterday where we played some decent one touch stuff and it came to him, you could see it was clearly a poor touch but it ended up falling to our player. The commentator mentioned how that was much better from Spurs and that it was some good one touch stuff. He is shocking, i'd love to play against Richie as a CB knowing the tactics are to get it into him back to goal.

I still can't place him as a centre forward when I look at how he plays. At his best he was the wide forward foil to a Calvert-Lewin type number 9. The 2 together were a handful for a period.
 
The problem we have with him is he cannot control a ball very well and his hold up play is shocking. when his back is to goal no one is scared of what he can do. There was 1 moment yesterday where we played some decent one touch stuff and it came to him, you could see it was clearly a poor touch but it ended up falling to our player. The commentator mentioned how that was much better from Spurs and that it was some good one touch stuff. He is shocking, i'd love to play against Richie as a CB knowing the tactics are to get it into him back to goal.
He's not a 9. If we'd kept Lankshear, we could've played
Tel..........Richarlison
Lankshear​
I'd even play Scarlett ahead of him at 9.
 
Back