• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Daniel Levy - Former Chairman

Surely im more likely to be impressed, if it turns out he’s actually good l.

If he is a 52m defender we’ll all be fudging delighted because we’ll barely ever concede.

Romero and VDV are both supposed to be £50 million+ defenders and we’ve just finished 17th in consecutive seasons, having conceded a bucket load of goals each time.

Go figure, as the World Cup joint hosts would say.
 
Romero and VDV are both supposed to be £50 million+ defenders and we’ve just finished 17th in consecutive seasons, having conceded a bucket load of goals each time.

Go figure, as the World Cup joint hosts would say.

we paid 21m for Kevin Danso, had we had two Kevin Danso's, for 42m, playing every week, we would never concede a goal

I do not believe Van Hecke is as good as 2 and a half Kevin Danso's, I think he's about a quarter of a Kevin Danso

Kevin Danso is the best CB we have, he is my yardstick
 
Err I started following Spurs in the 80s, we finished 4th twice and 3rd 3 times with 1 serious league title challenge that decade and won the UEFA and FA Cups when they genuinely still prestigious competitions.

Yes the following decade was awful but when I started following Spurs we were one of the big 5, so yes we fell from that position but I would have compared us to those teams at the time. Even in the Sugar era it took some time before we really began to lose our status, it wasn't until the mid to late 90s when we were truly on the brick heap.

So yes you're right the era directly before ENIC we wouldn't compared but Sugar's reign is hardly the be all and end all of Spurs and we were considered a sleeping giant for a reason.
As I said…. sugar was a godsend for Levy and ENIC as it fooled some of our fans into thinking that we weren’t a big 6 club.
 
Fair summary here

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

These are all fair points from SJ.

Thing he misses though is that Levy was with us last summer. The money was available, the way we engaged with the market had changed. And I just don’t think Levy could hang.

So I don’t really agree that had Levy had this extra capital to get around the wages to turnover ratio that the banks wanted to see, that he would have done better with it. He had his shot through a whole transfer window and floundered.

I do agree with SJ on the bullying point though. Trying to shift the narrative to Levy being the reason for all the problems and ignoring his successes is just low, and it doesn’t wash.
 
What annoys me about that Levy and SJ interaction the other day is how smug levy seems to be about spurs “having their pants pulled down by Brighton”. Texting his mate live on the air …

It almost confirms everything that I thought about his transfer dealings, his ego to negotiate and drive down the prices to avoid getting his pants pulled down in public would be worse than backing the manager.

Then when Spurs finally back the manager and pay over the odds he does the above … he’s not bitter.

Upwards and onwards
 
I’ve not watched any of the SJ texting Levy stuff but seen the headlines, and ultimately that’s what they are after at TalkSPORT. Clips are the currency for that medium now.

At any point has he mentioned asking Levy about selling his shares? If not then he’s not much of a journalist or presenter that he purports to be
 
I’ve not watched any of the SJ texting Levy stuff but seen the headlines, and ultimately that’s what they are after at TalkSPORT. Clips are the currency for that medium now.

At any point has he mentioned asking Levy about selling his shares? If not then he’s not much of a journalist or presenter that he purports to be

Tbf I don’t think he sees himself as a journalist or a presenter. He’s a talking head, paid to be controversial.
 
Back