• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Personally I'd say it is far too early to judge post Levy Spurs at present. We won't know whether we're better managed or not for another 2 or 3 years at least. It takes a while to turn an oil tanker.
It hardly needs turning.

We carry on with the juggernaut of cash generation Levy created...always looking to spend it better.... adding to it is the only differentiator if we (they) want to show aMbiTiOn.

Of course, everything is easier said than done.....and I think they are going to find that out. And I don't think that will take 2-3 years. More likely to be sold in that time window imo.
 
CL games though, no where near, people said no thanks to the ludicrous pricing
Not one PL game over 62,000 though
Don't forget 62,850 capacity includes every single seat in stadium bowl , that includes seats which are not for sale and will not appear in the attendance figures i.e 126 directors box seats, 233 press/tv seats and 97 players bench and medical staff seats then there are also approx 330 wheelchair positions with carers seats that are unlikely to sell out for every match.
Plus not sure how they count the private box seats in the attendance totals, the east stand box seats on level 4 which I can see from where I sit has 334 available seats and I have never seen it full for any match , sometimes it looks like just 5 fans in a box than might be able to cater up to 10.
 
Don't forget 62,850 capacity includes every single seat in stadium bowl , that includes seats which are not for sale and will not appear in the attendance figures i.e 126 directors box seats, 233 press/tv seats and 97 players bench and medical staff seats then there are also approx 330 wheelchair positions with carers seats that are unlikely to sell out for every match.
Plus not sure how they count the private box seats in the attendance totals, the east stand box seats on level 4 which I can see from where I sit has 334 available seats and I have never seen it full for any match , sometimes it looks like just 5 fans in a box than might be able to cater up to 10.
Also if we have a strip of 5 to 10 seats x every row to separate home/away fans. For different competitions we have different numbers of away fans to 'house'.
 
That's tickets sold and not attendance thought. So many tickets are going unsold on the exhange now. I think ST renewals will be down at the end of this season unless something changes quite significantly between now and then.

Yeah I get that, was just pointing out that the table didn't really show what was being said.
 
Also if we have a strip of 5 to 10 seats x every row to separate home/away fans. For different competitions we have different numbers of away fans to 'house'.
We can get in just over 62,000 paying fans but it's only happened once so far and the way we are playing at the moment unlikely to happen for awhile. :)

The official stadium record attendance for a Tottenham game currently stands at 62,027 in the English Premier League match against Arsenal on 12 May 2022
 
It hardly needs turning.

We carry on with the juggernaut of cash generation Levy created...always looking to spend it better.... adding to it is the only differentiator if we (they) want to show aMbiTiOn.

Of course, everything is easier said than done.....and I think they are going to find that out. And I don't think that will take 2-3 years. More likely to be sold in that time window imo.
It needs turning. The club needs to invest significant amounts into scouting and data and we need to have MUCH better succession planning.
 
It needs turning. The club needs to invest significant amounts into scouting and data and we need to have MUCH better succession planning.

Do we really?

- VDV, Udogie, Sarr, Bergvall, Vuscovic seem to indicate our youth scouting isn't that bad?
- Gray, Xavi, Porro, Odobert, Romero, Danso even Gallagher hardly required a WC scouting setup, all known before

Believe me, I work with data as part of my industry, but I think data is what got us Frank, when an eye test would have told you otherwise.

Succession planning (we fudging should have Frank's replacement already lined up, and a short list since about November) and better strategic squad planning (e.g. profile and balance), I 100% agree with.
 
for those who are against the modern fangled data and LLM approach, I've done an old school search, on something called Google, it suggests our top targets should be Cherno Samba and Tonton Zola Moukoko
 
Wharton, souza and diomende

Akiouche and lukebe also mentioned.

Yours just seem to be aggregating news stories, rather than having access to any databases. It is pretty crap at things like this, and its getting worse as its now circular learning from its own degrading data
 
Yours just seem to be aggregating news stories, rather than having access to any databases. It is pretty crap at things like this, and its getting worse as its now circular learning from its own degrading data

Asked it again if it were spurs.

TargetRoleEst. CostWhy him over the "Rumors"?Adam WhartonDeep Playmaker£55mBetter technical ceiling than Gallagher.Maghnes AklioucheLeft Winger/10£50mMore creative than Yan Diomande.Antonee RobinsonLeft Back£35mMore reliable than a 19-year-old from Brazil.
 
Back