I really want Odobert to work out, but yeah he didn't do much although he had some involvement in our goal and a few if the possession moments in the Brighton's box. I wouldn't say that's enough though, he's had a reasonable amount of the ball and done not a great deal.
Salah gets a foul for that every single time.
We've striking options, two of them are injured though.
Sure, but doesn't mean it should be or is a foul. I don't care whether it's Salah, Richy or Messi.
I didn't think it was a foul at all. I didn't think Richy had to go down.
I think the Kudus one was worse. We definitely would have scored there, we had Kudus totally free and two men over and I didn't see anything like a foul unless there was a clip.
That's what I mean.
One counter and one sleeping Vicaro, apart from that we've been the better team. We still lack offensively though, Richarlison is a proper footballer but not a reliable target man or a good enough (lone) striker for a team with serious ambitions.
It wasn't a foul, Kudus didn't even impede their player. The defender totally misjudged the flight and Kudus just stood up strong and took the ball from the air. On first glance it might have looked like a foul but if the ref hasn't called it and we had scored theres no way VAR would have pulled it back. Basically we got bumped because the ref totally misread what happened. Which is frustrating in the VAR era.
It was one where the advantage to us looked so outrageously huge (though fair) the ref thought he had to call a foul. Like how it used to be when a last man got tackled (fairly or not).
I think he has the skills, but he also has a Pavlyuchenko-level tendency to be slightly off. He's a premiership footballer but a championship striker.
