• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Thomas Frank - Head Coach

I wouldn't be against him, but the chances are we will be back hearing about "The Tottenham way" in 6 months.

We also need 4/5 players to play his way, so could see a slow start whilst we do this.

He's the best choice If we stay domestic, I'm just not convinced he would work style wise at Spurs.

Might help us with Wharton though.
I hate 3 at the back so for that reason alone I don't want him 😅

However if he does get the job the squad needs a bit of an overhaul. We arguably have 3 WBs that could work, still to add the 4th obviously. The CM options don't work, so that would need to be completely altered. The wide players and attackers probably needs changing in terms of profile as well.

Personally I think it's a bad move because so few managers can 3 at the back well that if we invest in a squad to suit him, if it doesn't work we're again stuck with a squad that doesn't suit the majority of managers.
 
As long as we win games, I don't really care how we do it, I'm not paying £1000s for a season ticket anymore, so I accept my pov holds less weight that those that do who have to sit through it.

Liverpool won titles playing counter attacking football under Klopp, if it wasn't for city and their cheating he would have had a few more.

I seem to recall people did start to turn on him and his style quite early on in the second season and it went down hill quickly and then his meltdown happened when we were around 5th/6th? So wasn't exactly a disaster season.

I think we will have a free run at Glasner if the club did want him.
I don't know about a free run. United suits him more because they already have a 3/5 at the back coach and have been building a squad to suit that. It might well make more sense for him to go there assuming the role was available.
 
The manager is being honest and some of you seem to forget that Harry Kane and Sonny papered over a heck of a lot of cracks. Who are are goal scorers? Who are our forwards? Richie is lovely guy but hardly a top striker. What fit creative players can we field? We have a team of mid table players and young wannabes. So enjoy it for what it is and try not to get caught up in a sense of entitlement, which seems to be one of the curses of the age.
 
As long as we win games, I don't really care how we do it, I'm not paying £1000s for a season ticket anymore, so I accept my pov holds less weight that those that do who have to sit through it.

Liverpool won titles playing counter attacking football under Klopp, if it wasn't for city and their cheating he would have had a few more.

I seem to recall people did start to turn on him and his style quite early on in the second season and it went down hill quickly and then his meltdown happened when we were around 5th/6th? So wasn't exactly a disaster season.

I think we will have a free run at Glasner if the club did want him.
There will always be a portion whinging, I don't recall there being a particular big grumbling at the stadium but if that's a poor example fair enough.

We could have got Glasner in the summer but went for Frank which I disagreed with but they must have their reasons - so bar a disaster might aswell see it out this season and see how everyone at the club feels (and fans of course)....
 
Back