• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The best album of the 90's - Fat of the Land vs Vs

Which is the better album?


  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .

milo

Jack L. Jones
The Prodigy's second album in the competition comes up against Pearl Jam's second.

The Prodigy - Fat of the Land

220px-TheProdigy-TheFatOfTheLand.jpg


The Fat of the Land is the third studio album by English electronic dance music group The Prodigy. The album was released by XL Recordings on 30 June 1997 and on 1 July 1997 in the United States by Maverick Records.

The album has received critical acclaim and has sold over 10 million copies worldwide as of 2012.

Vs

Pearl Jam - Vs

220px-PearlJam-Vs.jpg


Vs. is the second studio album by the American rock band Pearl Jam, released on October 19, 1993 through Epic Records.[1] After a relentless touring schedule in support of their 1991 debut album Ten, Pearl Jam headed into the studio in early 1993 facing the challenge of following up the commercial success of its debut. The resulting album, Vs., featured a rawer and more aggressive sound compared with the band's previous release. It was the band's first collaboration with producer Brendan O'Brien.

Pearl Jam decided to scale back its commercial efforts for Vs., including declining to produce music videos for any of the album’s singles. Upon its release, Vs. set the record for most copies of an album sold in its first week, a record it held for five years. Vs.occupied the number one spot on the Billboard 200 chart for five weeks, the longest duration for a Pearl Jam album. The album has been certified seven times platinum by the RIAA in the United States.
 
Probably going to surprise a few of you here but I'm voting for Fat of the Land.

There are a few really, really good tracks on that album whereas Vs never really feels like it gets started. 10 was better IMO.
 
Probably going to surprise a few of you here but I'm voting for Fat of the Land.

There are a few really, really good tracks on that album whereas Vs never really feels like it gets started. 10 was better IMO.

same here, completely agree
 
Good times associated with both these.

Would not bother listening to anything from fotl now though. Iit was a bit cynically commercial and accompanied by a massive forward promotional campaign in the uk. Of its time.

What difference does it make.
 
Back