Finney Is Back
Andy Thompson
Where is it that girls learn to stand for photos like that one on the left?
Is there?
Both employ large number of low paid employees
Both work in a relatively decent margin business
And both are global brands
You make £300k on what turnover? It’s all about ratios when running a businessYou make around 200k a year running a McDonalds franchise
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/...learing-profits-of-200000-a-year-8834600.html
Meanwhile Levy gave him a bonus of £3m. Levy already owns a huge percentage of ENIC.
One can afford to continue paying £300k a month or whatever to the employees that are on the living wage. The other can't.
You make £300k on what turnover? It’s all about ratios when running a business
and that bonus was awarded last season
If fudging Bournemouth and West Ham can afford to fully pay their employees why can't we?
You couldn't be more wrong. Anyone (or any business) that pays taxes should do everything they can to minimise what they pay and maximise what they get back.True, but I can't defend what we're doing, though. Arsenal have done the right thing, we have not. West Ham have done the right thing, we have not. Brighton, Burnley, Crystal Palace...
...this is wrong, mate. And as for the point you made yesterday re: being a net contributor in terms of taxes, so what? I would suspect the majority of middle class people are (and above), the majority of viable businesses are - almost all of them less financially loaded than super-rich fudging Tottenham Hotspur.
We can do without. We don't have to stiff the taxpayers and screw our own staff.
We can be better. We don't have to go down this squalid route, and be like Sports Direct's Mike Ashley. This shouldn't be what we, as a club, think is acceptable behaviour.
Stripper school.Where is it that girls learn to stand for photos like that one on the left?
Is that an article you have to be registered to read?The first a lot of people heard about their pay cut was in the media unless they were checking their emails every 5 minutes
This part is another absolute disgrace
"non-playing employees have also been encouraged to take their annual leave during the coronavirus crisis."
No holidays this year mate, you got a holiday during an international pandemic stuck inside all day.
True, but I can't defend what we're doing, though. Arsenal have done the right thing, we have not. West Ham have done the right thing, we have not. Brighton, Burnley, Crystal Palace...
...this is wrong, mate. And as for the point you made yesterday re: being a net contributor in terms of taxes, so what? I would suspect the majority of middle class people are (and above), the majority of viable businesses are - almost all of them less financially loaded than super-rich fudging Tottenham Hotspur.
We can do without. We don't have to stiff the taxpayers and screw our own staff.
We can be better. We don't have to go down this squalid route, and be like Sports Direct's Mike Ashley. This shouldn't be what we, as a club, think is acceptable behaviour.
Is there?
Both employ large number of low paid employees
Both work in a relatively decent margin business
And both are global brands
What should the club be doing?Sadly, for me more "rubber meets the road" stuff here mate.
We saw it in November, and now we're seeing it again.
Billyiddo captured the greater scheme of things, and in that regard, the club should be doing all it can to help the bigger picture, as should our squad and coaching staff.
Look at what some NBA players have done in the US?!!!
Look at what a few of the owners have done?!!!
I don't rake it in but have made sure to do what I can where I can (tip takeout like dine in, paid for a haircut I won't receive and will do so again if this drags out).
If everyone proportionately did what they could then we'd be OK.
I don't see anything in that statement as suggesting we are "doing what we can" to even 50% of what is possible.
I am learning -painfully- that elements of what this club means to me (and stands for) appear to be abstract concepts in the overall view of many.
Burkinshaw's words echo again...
How ?Yes.
There is a huge difference.
Come on are you joking?
You couldn't be more wrong. Anyone (or any business) that pays taxes should do everything they can to minimise what they pay and maximise what they get back.
The govt will only spaff it up the wall on tracksuit families and giving triple heart bypasses to fat clams.
That’s all they can doIm very interested to see how they start to recoup some of all the money that is going out at the moment.
Politically they cant really touch the low paid, it would be suicide to go after pensioners as that is their core vote. I cant see what they can do except let the debt get bigger and bigger. That might be more and more traction given to countries equalising each others debt.
That’s all they can do
HallelujahIt shouldn't be forgotten that we are one of (if not) the only PL club that actually has a "viable business model", most of the other clubs are merely playing with debt or the money of benefactors, it's far easier in that situation to take the seemingly selfless act.
We have to play by the same rules as normal companies, because we are a normal company, and we'll have to keep in dialog with our bank(s) regarding our methods of financial prudence.
They've got to pay the bonds out.Im very interested to see how they start to recoup some of all the money that is going out at the moment.
Politically they cant really touch the low paid, it would be suicide to go after pensioners as that is their core vote. I cant see what they can do except let the debt get bigger and bigger. That might be more and more traction given to countries equalising each others debt.