NoLimits01
Goran Bunjevcevic
Nope, I'm not the one wearing lycraYou sound like a right clam.
Nope, I'm not the one wearing lycraYou sound like a right clam.
Nobody is ever able to look a cyclist in the eye. The full kit clown shoe lycra always sees to that.
I don't drive around London nearly as much as I used to, but I can't remember the last time I made a journey without being held up by a cyclist at some point.
In the other directionWhere are you looking?
In the other direction
Of course, if you take the wrong routes, you'll be stopped by everything.As opposed to buses, taxis, cars, motorcycles and pedestrians.........
Don't diss 1DOne Direction?
Don't diss 1D
Of course, if you take the wrong routes, you'll be stopped by everything.
I'm talking about a situation when the traffic is flowing (relatively) freely - it's not at all uncommon for a cyclist to leave the cycle lanes to overtake other cyclists, or pull into the right hand lane a long way before turning, or sit in front of cars that are endlessly faster to a start at a set of lights.
That's an issue for me and seems like the most ridiculous implementation possible. Why have the slowest moving vehicles at the front of the queue? Why can't they queue up in the cycle lane like drivers have to queue up in the real people lanes? I assume the implementation was so that cyclists who are turning right at the junction have space in which to do so, which is sensible but having them use that area for going forwards at a fraction of the speed of even the slowest cars is nothing short of ridiculous.In answer to your last reply to me as well. That's where there's integration nowadays. Not sure if this is something that's been implemented since you've left but there's a designated cycle area at the beginning of sets of traffic lights, so there's always going to be a delay for drivers whilst the bikes push off and get themselves to the cycle lane/side.
I'm all for the number of cyclists increasing - especially if that's matched with a decrease in the number of cars in my way. My issue is when those cyclists leave their little box and get in my way - they shouldn't be allowed into the real world any more than us motorists are allowed into their little toy one on the left.There are a LOT more cycles on the road now, like many smaller major cities I've experienced. That number will grow further since they have introduced alternatives to the TFL bikes, which can be left anywhere and paid for/unlocked through an app. They've also introduced electric bikes to hire recently.
That's an issue for me and seems like the most ridiculous implementation possible. Why have the slowest moving vehicles at the front of the queue? Why can't they queue up in the cycle lane like drivers have to queue up in the real people lanes? I assume the implementation was so that cyclists who are turning right at the junction have space in which to do so, which is sensible but having them use that area for going forwards at a fraction of the speed of even the slowest cars is nothing short of ridiculous.
I'm all for the number of cyclists increasing - especially if that's matched with a decrease in the number of cars in my way. My issue is when those cyclists leave their little box and get in my way - they shouldn't be allowed into the real world any more than us motorists are allowed into their little toy one on the left.
I was hoping for a role on the new series of Top Gear but I have been unable to cultivate the prerequisite man gut.Sincerely, you have a wonderful way with words.
So this Levy chap is a good chairman, no?
I was hoping for a role on the new series of Top Gear but I have been unable to cultivate the prerequisite man gut.
Fair play to the beeb, I didn’t think it would be possible to find three bigger clams than Clarkson and co but they have nailed it.
Without needing to call in @scaramanga
Sorry I have been away in Canada with little coverage.
Well I think you will see a huge fringe cull, the likely lads such as Vorm, Llorente, Janssen etc will be out and clear alot of wages. Coming in not much in terms of names but from what I have been told they are serious and want to get their business done quick.
The main issue we have and this is my opinion, is once we start to show intent on names we are there to be shot at by clubs with more financial power, we have the funds to spend big this summer but not silly and that may be a stumble.
That would be taking a gun to a knife fight.
Although they have moved most of the company to Manchester...
That would be taking a gun to a knife fight.
Although they have moved most of the company to Manchester...
Top Gear producers said:...yeah we've got Paddy McGuinness on board, we don't want to take the tinkle