Conor Gallagher

[Bishop]

If we avoid relegation and finally sign a ball-playing CMF plus a left footer (with a bit more experience than some talented Brazilian teenager) then perhaps Gallagher will come good but he’s not what this squad needed in January.

If we sign a ball playing 8 where is Gallagher going to play? He's not quite a DM either, so a strange signing imo considering our more obvious weaknesses. He comes across like a Levy (but no Levy) special ie. A deal to be had but no thoughts as to how he actually fixes a gap.

I don't dislike him as a player but I've never particularly wanted him mainly because he doesn't really address any of our faults.

 

[Welshspur60]

Looked shattered yesterday. Was still running, but had the running style of an exhausted Scott Parker out there.

He was poor, no doubt. But I'm guessing that's partly fitness/inury/similar problems and that this also contributed to how poor he was on the ball.

It beggars belief that him and others seem tired. They play once a week and have to run around for 95 minutes. Really only about 50 considering the time for throw ins, goal kicks etc . They are in the prime of their lives.
I dont buy this tired bullcrap. They just arent putting in 100 %.

 

[NaijaSpurs]

I was totally against the signing of Gallagher from day one. He is not the reason we are a poor team but he does not improve us. He runs about alot but offensively he gives us nothing.

 

[thfcsteff]

It’s almost impossible to judge any player right now.
What I will say is that I expect him to give everything whenever he plays next (I personally hope that is off the bench Thursday)…