Bad pundit world cup - Charlie Nicholas v Thierry Henry

[milo]

It's a Goon off to seal the seventh QF place between Charlie Nicholas and Thierry Henry. Both are brain rot but which is worse?

 

[Aldo]

Couldn't decide so I went for Nicholas purely on the basis that he's been a clam for longer.

 

[Lemonade Money]

Couldn't decide so I went for Nicholas purely on the basis that he's been a clam for longer.

Works for me.

 

[Rorschach]

Nicholas is a fudgewit but Henry is a purebred clam. I don't care who the best/worst pundit is

 

[Gazza]

Nicholas for his stupid earring alone.

Henry is just road kill stuck on the wheels 10 miles down the road.

 

[Rorschach]

 

[Jordinho]

Nicholas, like Merson and Thompson, isn't a pundit. He's a sideshow.

 

[the dza]

Henry is a smug qunt, so him.

 

[Mikey10]

I'm sitting here thinking it's Thierry.

 

[nayimfromthehalfwayline]

Nicholas, like Merson and Thompson, isn't a pundit. He's a sideshow.

I feel like this is a really unfair choice because they are both scum.

That said, Nicholas is kept away from any "meaningful"* shows by being left on Soccer Saturday.

Henry is front and centre on all the big games, which is far worse.

Aside from the fact Nicholas is a clam, but a tacotish one. Henry is just scum. Who thinks he is amazing, while actually being an idiot and snide clam.

 

[milo]

Nicholas is through to the QFs