Bad pundit world cup - Charlie Nicholas v Steven Gerrard

[milo]

The glamour tie of the round sees Charlie Nicholas take on Steven Gerrard. For many this would have been the perfect final. Two top qunts fighting it out for the title but sadly they've met in the quarter finals. Only one can go on but who should it be?

 

[Rorschach]

Tough choice

 

[Jordinho]

Thankfully not really seen much of either as pundits, so voted for the biggest clam.

 

[Kandi1977]

I went for Nicholas purely because he has been a qunt for longer.

 

[greatwhitenorf]

Sound reasoning.

And, after his horrible ending to his career - both in Liverpool and, especially, LA - Gerrard has become something of a figure more to be pitied, laughed at and mocked than resented.

 

[Glenda's Legs]

Can't stand Gerrard.
But Nicholas for me. And it gives an excuse to post this.

 

[scaramanga]

Never thought I'd vote against Gerrard in a clam contest, but obviously have.

 

[the dza]

It's Charlie Tw@tneck, all day.

 

[Mikey10]

Gerrard.

Carragher.

Thompson.

Every one a winner.

Spot the link.

 

[Seedy Ron]

Gerrard. Because the self smugness he exudes, which seems to cause him to wear a permanent pained expression, is more prevalent in ruining my enjoyment of football thanks to BT employing the clam.

 

[milo]

Nicholas proves that he's a big time Charlie by going through to the semis