• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Search results

  1. scaramanga

    American politics

    Are you seriously arguing for not removing someone like Maduro? Have a read up on him and then tell me how you're going to defend that opinion.
  2. scaramanga

    American politics

    I'd argue (as will the US, I'm sure) that as a dictator, and not the elected leader of a country, Maduro isn't afforded the protection that political leaders are in international law.
  3. scaramanga

    American politics

    It does and with very good reason. I don't think it should be all that hard to be not on the side of Russia/China/Iran.
  4. scaramanga

    American politics

    Venezuela are not, but Russia, Iran and China would all very much like to. It would be foolish to allow any of them control of a country that close.
  5. scaramanga

    ***OMT - Tottenham Hotspur Football Club vs AFC Bournemouth***

  6. scaramanga

    The Cricket Thread

    Did we just get fudged by snicko delay again?
  7. scaramanga

    American politics

    Far from it, I think his economic policies are terrible. But that doesn't mean everything he does is wrong. Toppling someone like Maduro is an unambiguous right.
  8. scaramanga

    American politics

    How many other countries are as physically close to the US with such close ties to Iran, Russia and China? I wouldn't be surprised to see Nicaragua get closer to Russia and then the US gets involved there. But mostly, South America has been cured of the communist disease and it should thank...
  9. scaramanga

    American politics

    They would have had to stop a country on their doorstep that was building Russian munitions and importing Iranian drones regardless. The oil just makes it pay for itself.
  10. scaramanga

    American politics

    Maybe they can't. But I don't think the US wants an end to the "No nukes in our back garden" agreement.
  11. scaramanga

    American politics

    Do you genuinely think the US would have invaded Venezuela if they were a Western democracy with friendly ties to the US? I love the wishful thinking about oil not being required but unfortunately, the world doesn't run on nice ideas and unicorn brick.
  12. scaramanga

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    https://spectator.com/article/the-lefts-snivelling-silence-on-iran/
  13. scaramanga

    American politics

    That's good news. I'll look forward to the Russian munitions factories completing their first batch of cuddly unicorn toys any day now. Almost as much as I'll look forward to those Iranian drones being used for a Pride display.
  14. scaramanga

    American politics

    And jet fuel doesn't melt steel, right?
  15. scaramanga

    American politics

    The US tried regime change in Cuba for years. Since the missile crisis, the US has had an agreement with Russia that Cuba doesn't store nukes if the US doesn't attack. It's clearly the best decision for everyone that the US doesn't attack.
  16. scaramanga

    American politics

    It poses a huge threat. Any country with close ties to China and Russia is a danger. One within missile/drone range, particularly so.
  17. scaramanga

    American politics

    They tried, for a long time.
  18. scaramanga

    American politics

    That's far too simplistic a take on things. The real (and very valid) issue for the US is there being a Russian/Chinese puppet with close ties to Iran and Cuba on their doorstep.
  19. scaramanga

    (Brennan) Johnson Again Olé Olé!

    He's scored the same goals per 90 as Salah and that Reindeer bloke at City. Makes £35m feel a bit cheap.
  20. scaramanga

    (Brennan) Johnson Again Olé Olé!

    As much as I like him as a player, I don't think he was ever right for Spurs. As you've said, he thrives on being able to run into space behind - we've not been afforded that except against the top teams in a long time now. He thrives on space, which we've been terrible at creating for...
Back