• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Search results

  1. L

    Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

    So he acts sanguine in public, but gets his "friends" Lammy and the Trust to immediately make public statements supporting the Club's case? You may think that, but in my view both Lammy and the Trust are being populist and are acting on their own behalf, getting onside with their constituency...
  2. L

    ITK Thread

    :)
  3. L

    Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

    According to the Annual Reports, there was a dividend of 4p per share for the year ending 30 June 2007, a further dividend of 4p per share for the year ending 30 June 2008, totalling about £3.7 million each, most of which would have gone to ENIC, and nothing for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and...
  4. L

    *** Tottenham Hotspur vs Burnley *** FA Cup OMT ***

    Pochettino complained recently that it would be better to play the match after a thursday night Europa League tie on a monday rather than a Sunday to help recovery time for the players. If you add the fact that Tottenham have come through a period of 5 matches in 16 days between 17th December to...
  5. L

    New takeover rumours

    Tottenham Hotspur Football and Athletic Company Limited was a Private Company at the time and it was difficult for anyone new to buy shares. Indeed when Irving Scholar bought the Club in the early eighties and made it public, he used the ruse of buying proxies for the votes at the AGM to get the...
  6. L

    *** Tottenham Hotspur vs. Burnley OMT ***

    The first one is Ralph Coates. The second is Mark Kendall. The third is Paul Mahorn (Typo!). I agree with the others, apart from Tony Parks (another typo!).
  7. L

    Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

    Re: Northumberland Development Project - Archway Have Appealed The official New Stadium Update on the Club's website on 10th September stated: "Given the lengthy period of time taken to reach the CPO decision in the first place, we should like to advise supporters that it is highly unlikely we...
  8. L

    Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

    Re: Northumberland Development Project - Archway Have Appealed I think that some people take themsleves far too seriously, but I've learned a lesson. Rest assured, it won't happen again.
  9. L

    Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

    Re: Northumberland Development Project - Archway Have Appealed Surely the only way that surly Archway can afford a Jarndyce v Jarndyce situation is if they have a sponsor.
  10. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover If there was a leak, which I'm not convinced of, but seems to be the consensus, who triggered it? Cui Bono? It's hardly likely to be Tottenham because they don't welcome the interest, and want to concentrate on the NPD. Both Tottenham and Cain Hoy are agreed on that. Cain...
  11. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover I have an interest in buying Spurs. I know what the price is likely to be and guess what? I'm not interested at that price. Cain Hoy knew what the ball-park price might be, because it had been leaked; they knew that they had only been in discussions on funding, not a...
  12. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover My memory of the events is that Cain Hoy's announcement and the Telegraph article were contemporaneous and occurred a couple of days after the "Mirror" article saying Tottenham were up for sale for £1 billion but that there were no takers. However, if Cain Hoy were indeed...
  13. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover They didn't leak it. They announced it on 12th September.
  14. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover In my view, Cain Hoy's actions outweigh your words.
  15. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover Cain Hoy announced it was commencing operations on 11th September. On 12th September it leaked or rather announced its "interest" in a takeover of the club. At that time very few in this country had ever heard of Cain Hoy in any of its guises. Tottenham immediately...
  16. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover Neither Cain Hoy nor the club have suggested that a bid was on the table. Cain Hoy stated that they were at the early stage of preliminary investigations, (not takeover negotiations) which lasted a fortnight before they opted out. I believe that under Stock Exchange...
  17. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover "12 September 2014 Statement re. press speculation Tottenham Hotspur Limited ("THFC") notes the continuing press reports surrounding a potential takeover and the announcement released by Cain Hoy Enterprises, LLC ("Cain Hoy"). THFC confirms it is not in takeover...
  18. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover Millsy_Yiddo: You state: "if they have taken the time to meet with representatives to discuss, as we did in this case, then they are interested enough to meet with representatives to discuss and that tends to lead to an eventual sale." This ignores the fact that the...
  19. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover I would be surprised if ENIC sell up before they can maximize the sale price. To me that means after the CPO has been sorted out, and when Stadium funding, including naming rights, has been completed. Then they will have a decision to make as to whether the sale price is...
  20. L

    Carlyle takeover, was Cain Hoy takeover

    Re: Cain Hoy takeover All three in my view.
Back