Yet another VARsical decision which is far from clear and obvious and subject to whichever frame they decide to freeze
Where’s the 5cm tolerance that got wheeled out when Liverpool had a goal questioned?Its probably technically correct but in my belief not in the spirit of the original law. I've not seen this incident but thought VAR checked all goals for offside whether it was clear and obvious.
Sherwood on Refwatch said that Rohl was correct to not get a red because where else was his foot supposed to go in his follow through. Though I agree with him, where was this chat on the (at least) two occasions Romero has done the same and been sent off?
Yep. Now just apply this principle fairly and consistently.If you can’t follow through safely you shouldn’t be doing it.
Studs + Ankle = Red
![]()
Would Bournemouth have made the Champions League without VAR?
BBC Sport assesses how VAR interventions may have impacted games at key moments and how some teams might appreciate the system more than others.www.bbc.co.uk
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.