I must admit to getting frustrated with BF3. It started as a fairly tactical shooter, with squads working together and lots of cooperation. After my break of a couple of months playing Skyrim I've come back to find it more of a CoD clone. With players just running randomly and doing their own thing without really thinking about the objectives.
I still get the odd great game, but they're few and far between.
I'll write a similar guide for the last 3 CODs for you:
1) Pick any assault rifle with a red dot sight.
2) Point and shoot.
3) ???
4) Profit
Yeah I love a good single player story, which is why I love the Uncharted series and GHod of War series. Also both Batman Arkham games have had great stories and characters... It's not always about Multiplayer, although for games like COD and BF it has become all about the Multiplayer. This isn't necessarily a bad thing but it shouldn't mean the single player experience becomes almost an afterthought.
After my rant above I actually went back to MW3 single player story (was only 20% through) and had a 2nd attempt at it... And although it's fun in places it is quite frustrating and utterly ridiculous! Makes a Micheal Bay film seem lacking in action sequences! I've no problem with big action set pieces and "Wow" moments, but on COD: MW3 it's every single level which for me takes away the "Wow" factor. Seems since the success of the AC 130 mission on COD4:MW, every single COD since has had a similar mission thats more and more ridiculous everytime. The body count too would make Rambo seem a little inadequate.
I understand many people like this in a game but, me personally, I find it all a bit silly really. I prefer a tad more realism when it comes to a war simulator.
As for BF expansions, I agree papaspur that they should add some more Co-op missions and more assignments. But I also think (and prob said this on the old BF3 thread) they should maybe add more factions or more varied locations. I can't wait for the next BF3 expansion and hopefully won't have to wait long for it (I'm sure it's in developement as we speak)
EDIT: Also it seems EA/DICE are doing their job and getting rid of cheaters:
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/#!/bf3/news/view/2832654777875433247/
Hopefully the 3 hackers I reported were amongst them![]()
Right, this game makes a mockery of war. They go for cheap shots all the time in trying to provoke a reaction from gamers, or to do something controversial (no russians airport mission). I was tinkled off at that part in the campaign, not because of the controversy of shooting civilians in a video game, but the "why" of it. First off, it wasn't fun. The story sucked to begin with, so I won't even touch on that. It's just a lazy way of creating a talking point simply for the sake of it.
I adore CoD4. By far and away the best FPS I've ever played, but both the campaigns and the multiplayers of each of its sequels have been shocking in comparison. If I got a quid for every time I'd been shooting away and had something explode near me, forcing my screen to be spattered with red and have to be carried to the sounds of my own heavy breathing I'd be some way to regaining the money back I'd tinkled away on those games.
64 player 1000 ticket metro = absolute cluster fuk, but loads of points
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.