• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Naughty Emirates Marketing Project - Spot of Compo??

Then why did an entire gap analysis have to happen between England (FFP) and UEFA (PSR) to create a standardised PSR model in the middle of all of this period?

That did happen but they still would have broke both had they not been fudging the books.
 
They did not exploit a grey area though.

Also, why would City ever be answerable to UEFA directly? They are under The FA's jurisdiction. UEFA should seek permission from our FA if they want to interact with any of our clubs. Did Emirates Marketing Project ever give UEFA permission to negotiate on their behalf with the broadcasting companies only for the participating clubs get a 55% share in the UEFA comps? Did City give UEFA permission to use the other 45% to plough money into other countries and have an average UEFA staff salary of 150k euros?

This is the game being played here. The super league fiasco was very interesting when UEFA got their arses kicked around in court. They know they are on thin ice with their biggest stakeholders.
 
That did happen but they still would have broke both had they not been fudging the books.

What if the 2 models were in conflict with each other. They couldn't follow both at the same time etc etc.

You must see this devil's advocate point of view right? What happens when the investigators are surgically investigated themselves? Are they water-tight? I actually doubt it.
 
What if the 2 models were in conflict with each other. They couldn't follow both at the same time etc etc.

You must see this devil's advocate point of view right? What happens when the investigators are surgically investigated themselves? Are they water-tight? I actually doubt it.

I don’t think they were though. One was just stricter than the other.
 
Also, why would City ever be answerable to UEFA directly? They are under The FA's jurisdiction. UEFA should seek permission from our FA if they want to interact with any of our clubs. Did Emirates Marketing Project ever give UEFA permission to negotiate on their behalf with the broadcasting companies only for the participating clubs get a 55% share in the UEFA comps? Did City give UEFA permission to use the other 45% to plough money into other countries and have an average UEFA staff salary of 150k euros?

This is the game being played here. The super league fiasco was very interesting when UEFA got their arses kicked around in court. They know they are on thin ice with their biggest stakeholders.

Think same way you would be answerable to your lco council and the overall country then UK government.
 
Former exec at Liverpool & Aston Villa. He suggests City will most likely negotiate a settlement which includes a punishment and an allocation of funds to be paid to clubs based on league finishes during the period.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I have no faith whatsoever that the right thing will be done FWIW.

Having said that, here's four things which have to happen.

1) The current City ownership have to be found unfit for purpose and forced to sell.
2) The fines should be annual for each year they breached/broke the rules. Paid in full annually.
3) There should be a transfer ban for three seasons.
4) Immediate European ban for 5 seasons.

I want points deductions but I cannot see any way it can happen fairly this season with regards to teams played and teams to play. Probably the only thing which could be done is to give them a 60 - 70 point deduction from the start of NEXT season.
I think that given the amount of time these dingdongs and their lawyers have stretched this out, we can wait an extra few months after Xmas to sanction a fair points punishment. Essentially, anything they win this season will be even more tainted than what they won prior.
 
I have no faith whatsoever that the right thing will be done FWIW.

Having said that, here's four things which have to happen.

1) The current City ownership have to be found unfit for purpose and forced to sell.
2) The fines should be annual for each year they breached/broke the rules. Paid in full annually.
3) There should be a transfer ban for three seasons.
4) Immediate European ban for 5 seasons.

I want points deductions but I cannot see any way it can happen fairly this season with regards to teams played and teams to play. Probably the only thing which could be done is to give them a 60 - 70 point deduction from the start of NEXT season.
I think that given the amount of time these dingdongs and their lawyers have stretched this out, we can wait an extra few months after Xmas to sanction a fair points punishment. Essentially, anything they win this season will be even more tainted than what they won prior.

The point deductions have always come within the season that we are in. Everton, Forest etc. It would also be a PR disaster for City to win the league this season.
 
The point deductions have always come within the season that we are in. Everton, Forest etc. It would also be a PR disaster for City to win the league this season.

A fair point for sure, and I suppose with the precedent set as you stated they can do so. I think it is going to be very problematic all round, and given how the game has become increasingly litigious, I am bracing for suit after suit as various sides claim 'damages' from a variety of scenarios. What a mess!
 
Money is no punishment for City. The game is about glory, dreams and enjoyment and they have crushed that for fans.
I couldn't care if we got £250m it would never compensate for what might have been.
If a team had been found guilty of 114 infringement of league rules they would have been thrown out of all the leagues I've ever played in.
The more I read of this situation I fear City will suffer no meaningful punishment for years of cheating.
The media are just sitting on the fence I've not read or heard any comments which demonstrate any outrage at their actions or call for draconian action. After years of kissing their arse they can't bring themselves to face they've backed a wrong 'un.
 
A fair point for sure, and I suppose with the precedent set as you stated they can do so. I think it is going to be very problematic all round, and given how the game has become increasingly litigious, I am bracing for suit after suit as various sides claim 'damages' from a variety of scenarios. What a mess!

The equivalent punishment based on similar cases would be:

315 points deducted
£80M in total fines
£30M reduction in Premier League income for each season
5 window transfer ban along
Suspension and Expulsion of executives involved
 
Genuinely fascinated as to how long Khaldoon is going to keep doubling down on his ‘they are all biased, we’ve done absolutely nothing wrong’ rhetoric because at some point this just goes worse and worse for him. Like, the worry is that the UAE will put some pressure on the UK but I think it could just as easily be that his own position in the Kingdom is under threat. He will have brought them major embarrassment and they could decide to throw him under the bus.

There’s only so much fair minded people will be willing to hear the ‘of course, City say they are innocent’ arguments before it actually just becomes a massive drag on the game. Whatever small goodwill still exists towards the club and the fans who weren’t involved in the financial dealings is going to evaporate if they keep insisting on fully denying absolutely everything and insisting the panel of judges was rigged against them.

I listened incredulously to an hour of the Monday Night Club on 5Live tonight as Mark Chapman (we have to protect the view of the PL around the world), Pat Nevin (the players weren’t at fault and shouldn’t be punished) and Joe Hart (believes everything City have said on being innocent) essentially argued to leave well alone.

Thankfully a few fans messaged in and told them they were talking garbage.
 
I listened incredulously to an hour of the Monday Night Club on 5Live tonight as Mark Chapman (we have to protect the view of the PL around the world), Pat Nevin (the players weren’t at fault and shouldn’t be punished) and Joe Hart (believes everything City have said on being innocent) essentially argued to leave well alone.

Thankfully a few fans messaged in and told them they were talking garbage.

I wouldn't be too hard on such productions, I've seen Lineker and Neville get some stick over this too, they have to protect their companies from litigation, it's a minefield.
 
I wouldn't be too hard on such productions, I've seen Lineker and Neville get some stick over this too, they have to protect their companies from litigation, it's a minefield.

Understandable but it's not controversial or slanderous to say anyone found guilty of breaking the rules for such a long period should face punishment that will be both lengthy and a deter others from such actions.
 
I listened incredulously to an hour of the Monday Night Club on 5Live tonight as Mark Chapman (we have to protect the view of the PL around the world), Pat Nevin (the players weren’t at fault and shouldn’t be punished) and Joe Hart (believes everything City have said on being innocent) essentially argued to leave well alone.

Thankfully a few fans messaged in and told them they were talking garbage.

Goodness grief that must have been a frustrating listen. None of those points even stand up on their own merits.

The view of the PL around the world is not going to be helped by Emirates Marketing Project being found guilty on 114 charges and then getting off without much of a punishment. That would render the league a joke that nobody would take seriously,

The players weren’t dealing with the financials but they may never well have been there had the cheating not occurred.

And Joe Hart…the thing about believing everything City have said is that they have said absolutely nothing except the fact that they are innocent? Even the closest they get to critiquing the original leaks is to say they are inadmissible and out of context, they don’t meaningfully argue the substance. So I’m not sure how he can believe it.

I think City are fudged, and it’s the reason the case took so long. Everyone assumed it was because it would fizzle out on account of City’s owners being able to lawfare for as long as they want. But I think it was more making the PL a water tight case.
 
Money is no punishment for City. The game is about glory, dreams and enjoyment and they have crushed that for fans.
I couldn't care if we got £250m it would never compensate for what might have been.
If a team had been found guilty of 114 infringement of league rules they would have been thrown out of all the leagues I've ever played in.
The more I read of this situation I fear City will suffer no meaningful punishment for years of cheating.
The media are just sitting on the fence I've not read or heard any comments which demonstrate any outrage at their actions or call for draconian action. After years of kissing their arse they can't bring themselves to face they've backed a wrong 'un.

I think the only reason the media are sitting on the fence is because the detail of the findings haven’t been announced and no one wants to prejudice the proceedings or put themselves in the legal firing line.

I think they’re going to get a serious punishment, at least one relegation and titles stripped at the minimum. I think the question is how far down the pyramid they get sent, and how much compensation they will have to pay other clubs that missed out on prizes, prize money, and European revenue because of their cheating.
 
The equivalent punishment based on similar cases would be:

315 points deducted
£80M in total fines
£30M reduction in Premier League income for each season
5 window transfer ban along
Suspension and Expulsion of executives involved

Right.
But it's not going to happen that way and you know it.
How do you slap a 315 point deduction? It's beyond application.
The 5 window transfer ban is applicable.
When have executives been suspended or expelled (genuine question, I don't know - Abramovich obviously does not count).
Here's hoping what you outline is the least that happens!
 
Back