I agree completely about the ownership — there’s been a clear lack of direction and no coherent long-term football plan for years.
I’m fully onboard with getting rid of VV and Lange as well.
What I can’t understand, though, is why some people suddenly want Levy back. You don’t gradually decline from genuine title contenders, to simply fighting for top four, to regularly missing out on Europe, and then end up finishing 17th twice in a few seasons if the club is being run properly on the football side.
Levy sanctioned many of the transfers, backed a number of poor managerial appointments, and repeatedly oversaw rebuilds that either lacked a clear identity or were abandoned halfway through. Were all the bad decisions solely his fault? Of course not. But when one person has been the constant throughout the entire decline, it’s impossible to separate him from the overall trajectory of the club.
The biggest issue for me is that Spurs have spent years operating without a consistent football philosophy. Managers with completely different styles were hired one after another — Pochettino, Mourinho, Nuno, Conte, Ange — with squads constantly being rebuilt for conflicting approaches. That’s not bad luck; that’s poor leadership from the top.
People also point to the stadium and commercial growth as proof of success, and financially the club is in a strong position. But ultimately football clubs are judged on what happens on the pitch, and Spurs have regressed badly over the last 5–6 years despite having world-class infrastructure and resources most clubs would dream of.
Levy deserves credit for modernising the club commercially, but football-wise the project has clearly stalled. At some point you have to judge ownership on results, and the results have been a steady decline for a long time now.
Hopefully the next step is the owners eventually selling the club and Spurs finally getting fresh leadership with a proper football vision.
I'll try to answer some/all of that
Re Levy - He did a lot for the club, a lot that will keep paying off decades into the future. His football failures are vastly overstated, the club went from a previous decade+ of only finishing in top 6 once and not playing in Europe for over 20 years to finishing in top 6 with 3 exceptions in 17+ years, two trophies (not good enough) and the club's best run of places in the top flight in it's history (not PL history, total). And all of his failures have to be caveated with competing against the cheating of Chelsea/City and Saudi Sportswashing Machine, London fudging with us over Stadium planning/approval for a decade, Covid just when Stadium came online, and the true owners who would not invest into club. He also had some tie in (even if just a lifetime/25 years of personal investment to club)
I think what most people want is leadership (good or bad), and Levy was that, and we all know Frank would have been gone long before the club got to a risk position, and even it would have been panic buys in January, we would have bought (he wouldn't risk club status). Viani/Lange are not leaders, they may be competent in -1/-2 roles but they have shown not to be leaders.
Levy to me will become like the Ange conversation, you have to separate the "was it smart/right to move them on" from "we replaced them with brick"
Commercial success is critical, I know it winds fans up, but it's the reason Leicester won the PL and FA Cup and are two tiers down now, is because they didn't raise their commercials to match their success. Levy deeply understood this, when you look at the PL revenues, there is a massive gap between the top 6 and the other 14, so even when Spurs, United, Chelsea drop out of top 6, it really doesn't change anything because the 7th best side with earn 200-300M less per season, over 5 or 10 years that is an insurmountable advantage. No amount of smart club running will overcome that, Brighton, Bournemouth, Bretford will never replace the top 6 clubs and probably all will drop out of the PL in the next decade.
Now to pieces I 100% agree with, consistent football philosophy, the swings have hurt us with a squad built for multiple managers, it also dilutes our brand having Conte/Jose/Frank type managers, more than most we have had a claim to at least trying to play entertaining football. That said as fans, we would have to accept that a club that runs that way will not hire big name managers (unless you get very lucky and find one that somehow plays your style), Spurs may have to be content with more "aligned to attacking/possession" than say a scenario where club dictates style/formation/players and managers align (and I'm not sure any elite club does that anyway)
Re sale of club, I don't think it happens, and the chances of it happening with a good outcome is pretty low
- The last two big owners in PL are Saudi Sportswashing Machine and Chelsea, Chelsea is an utter clusterfudge and probably has long term financial viability issues at this point and lots of rumours that the Saudi's are tied of Saudi Sportswashing Machine, the limitations and would likely move on if given chance.
- Middle East money into Sportswashing is probably dead at this stage (they have bigger problems)
- Private Equity/American investment is a disaster, the bankruptcy rate on firms bought by PE is something like10X the average, they only know how to pay execs and asset strip, not how to make anything successful, financially or product wise (see enbrickification)
Our best hope is the owners eat some humble pie (Levy wasn't that easy to replace), be ruthless with the failures (Vinai/Lange/medical team/etc) and understand that success requires constant investment, and while commercial revenue will offset large parts of that, some years you just have to go to your pockets.