Grays_1890
Les Howe
What a cnut she was
What a cnut she was
She's still dead, right?!
Don’t worry. She’s back home now.The BITCH from hell
Hope its toasty for herDon’t worry. She’s back home now.
She's still dead, right?!
This isn't some kind of apocalypse resurrection
GB energy and the incremental renationalisation of buses and trains suggests not the former. But the carbon capture fallacy and not renationalising water are a very long way from Keynesian LabourI'd suggest Starmer is to the right of Thatcher on ecomomy and the EU in particular. Says a lot about where we are.
Starmer is pro-EU. He was the architect of the 2nd referendum policy. He just zipped that part of his belief system to be electable...I'd suggest Starmer is to the right of Thatcher on ecomomy and the EU in particular. Says a lot about where we are.
What he is and what he does are different. I'm concerned with the latter. His policies are Brexit.Starmer is pro-EU. He was the architect of the 2nd referendum policy. He just zipped that part of his belief system to be electable...
GB energy and the incremental renationalisation of buses and trains suggests not the former. But the carbon capture fallacy and not renationalising water are a very long way from Keynesian Labour
They had to be.What he is and what he does are different. I'm concerned with the latter. His policies are Brexit.
Nothing has to be. It's about choices. He has reneged on so many manifesto commitments I'm sure he could on his Brexit one.They had to be.
The brexit stuff is more fundamental than other stuff. What would reneging on it even look like? Just applying to rejoining the EU without a referendum? The Labour Party would probably implode in the resulting infighting. Plus, joining the EU now would look very different from what we left. We'd have to join the euro for example. The ship has sailed, something that Starmer himself has rightly acknowledged. And apart from anything else, it's only the fanatics that have any interest in rerunning all the toxic arguments we had to endure from 2016 to 2020.Nothing has to be. It's about choices. He has reneged on so many manifesto commitments I'm sure he could on his Brexit one.
Its economic self harm.
But his method is all optics and he wants to appeal to the much of the xenophobic base that was appealed to by Brexit. This is at the cost of the whole nation's prosperity.
I'd suggest Starmer is to the right of Thatcher on ecomomy and the EU in particular. Says a lot about where we are.
This is a good 7 minute watch on how the political needle has swung over the last generation.GB energy and the incremental renationalisation of buses and trains suggests not the former. But the carbon capture fallacy and not renationalising water are a very long way from Keynesian Labour
The brexit stuff is more fundamental than other stuff. What would reneging on it even look like? Just applying to rejoining the EU without a referendum? The Labour Party would probably implode in the resulting infighting. Plus, joining the EU now would look very different from what we left. We'd have to join the euro for example. The ship has sailed, something that Starmer himself has rightly acknowledged. And apart from anything else, it's only the fanatics that have any interest in rerunning all the toxic arguments we had to endure from 2016 to 2020.
As to economic self-harm, the world as we know it has ended. That's what a senior treasury official said on the news this morning when answering whether we are seeing the end of globalisation that has characterised the last few decades. Trump has blown the economic consensus out the water. If we were in the EU we'd be staring down the barrel of >20% US tariffs and the direct Ire of the world's foremost economy. We'd be staring down the abyss basically.
This is a good 7 minute watch on how the political needle has swung over the last generation.
Yeah, and it's not actually just Trump, he is just the most extreme example. The EU pushing back on Chinese car imports under pressure from German and French manufacturers is a symptom of increasing protectionism. As is French pressure on the EU to ban the clearing of euro transactions outside the eurozone, in order to try and end London's dominance over the currency. The main proponents of globalism (US and western Europe) have been turning their backs on it over the last 5 years and Trump has merely accelerated that process. This is intertwined with a broader public push-back on current volumes of global migration, which has been a key underlying aspect of globalisation.These are, indeed, incredible times in that regard. To see a whole economic system dynamically thrust upon the world and then effectively battered into submission within four decades is staggering.