I think Moura or Mane is a valid question - we probably wouldn't have bought Moura if we already had Mane.We were in for Mane the year after we bought Son.
The correct thread title should be Nkoudou or Mane?
I think Moura or Mane is a valid question - we probably wouldn't have bought Moura if we already had Mane.
In response to the original question, Son.
We were in for Mane the year after we bought Son.
The correct thread title should be Nkoudou or Mane?
Jesus, is this on CD now?Well we should have both!!!!!!.......if it wasn't for that tight pr.ick Levy, not backing his manager, we'd have won the league, walked the CL and even probably won the World Cup...huh.
How did you know I'm Jesus?Jesus, is this on CD now?
Wouldn't you like to know my son, wouldn't you like to knowHow did you know I'm Jesus?
We were in for Mane the year after we bought Son.
The correct thread title should be Nkoudou or Mane?
Sissoko was cause we missed out on Wjinaldum.Wasn’t it Sissoko or Mane?
We went for Sissoko as we couldn’t get Mane?
Wasn’t it Sissoko or Mane?
We went for Sissoko as we couldn’t get Mane?
Sissoko was cause we missed out on Wjinaldum.
We were in for Mane the year after we bought Son.
The correct thread title should be Nkoudou or Mane?
You are right. But that then begs the question. If we had Son, Lamela, Dele ( ? And Lennon?) why go for an expensive support striker when we had plenty of cover there- yet no cover whatsoever for Kane and Eriksen. Makes little sense to me.
And who would be first choice- Son or Mane?