• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

European Conversion/Defensive analysis

Spursalot

Spursalot

Jimmy McCormick
Whilst not always useful, they can be an interesting discussion point.


top-5-att.png



top-5-def.png




http://experimental361.com/2013/01/21/attacking-effectiveness-europe/



Edit: well the picture show better on the site, check em there. :p
 
Very accurate depiction of us.

We create "situations" rather than actual chances, which is why(coupled with poor finishing) we take so many efforts on goal to score. Whereas it's practically the opposite defensively. That sounds like a recipe for disaster but the amount of situations/chances on both sides of the ball is heavily in our favour so that keeps us up there.
 
We take lots of long shots because teams put ten men behind the ball and we have no way of breaking them down.
 
In plain English... we need lots of shots to score, but our opponents need few shots to score against us? Sounds about right.
 
King of Norway said:
In plain English... we need lots of shots to score, but our opponents need few shots to score against us? Sounds about right.
Click to expand...

Close.


We take approximately 17 shots per game and we tend to score every 9.5 shots.


Whilst our opponents take approximately 9 shots per game and we have conceded for every eight shots against us.
 
I watched Hannover the other night, Mame Biram Diouf scored a worldie overhead kick, you should check it out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back