• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Search results

  1. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    Well now I'm confused! What do we do? Cheer right?!
  2. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    Slicing your clearance onto your own arse from two yards and it not going.... wow
  3. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    It wasn't a pen. You can see Udogie slips over as he's trying to change direction
  4. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    My only thoughts are experience. This must the oldest team we've picked for a very very long time.
  5. monkeybarry

    *** The official 2025/26 Premier League thread ***

    Forest should. West Ham v Palace is harder to call. Although Palace seem to be on holiday with Glasner leaving
  6. monkeybarry

    A Moral Dilemma For you

    If Romero fouls a bear in the woods and no ref is around, is it still a red card?
  7. monkeybarry

    A Moral Dilemma For you

    Emirates Marketing Project's legal team agree with this message
  8. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    Madders on the bench - could be useful in the last 15!
  9. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    Gotta be something in the loan agreement, surely?!
  10. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I know that. I've been involved in DV, and I guess you have too. Trying to explain the principles to others to aid understanding. I would imagine the first line response would be from the vetting team to HR "based upon the developed vetting exercise, we recommend against appointment". FCDO HR...
  11. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    I don't doubt any of that - such is current relationship with the US, that the things you mention become qualifications for the role. But it doesn't address the question - was Starmer informed and Mandelson not passing Dev Vetting. What you describe about is politics. What is being discussed is...
  12. monkeybarry

    ***OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Brighton, White Hart Lane, Sat April 18th, 5.30pm***

    Leeds lose and we win - survival is then back in our hands
  13. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    What does that have to do with him knowing about the DV status?
  14. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    March was 2.5 weeks ago! Pretty sure I've still got unread emails from March FFS! These really are the kind of details the head of an organisation (IE the civil service) delegates and trusts is carried out properly and with good policy to underpin it. The Cabinet office will have known about...
  15. monkeybarry

    Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)

    That is correct, yes. It is a pass Vs fail, but the criteria are not binary - so the standards are different and appropriate to each appointment. Vetting is just a risk assessment. And yes re; not telling no.10 re the reason. They would just communicate that the appointment wasn't successful.
Back