• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Gutter Boy said:
and its getting worse as its now circular learning from its own degrading data
Click to expand...
In the words of David Gedge, "It's getting better all the time".
Each version of AI gets steadily better and better.
But remember, you are never asking AI for a truthful expert answer to a question, you are asking AI to create the sort of answer someone might expect to get from an expert i.e. it will fabricate links and text to create something approximating the sort of answer one might expect.

Whereas 18 months ago I asked AI what the historic scores were for Spurs v Liverpool and it made the whole list of scores up, including several years into the future!
 
Lilbaz said:
Asked it again if it were spurs.

TargetRoleEst. CostWhy him over the "Rumors"?Adam WhartonDeep Playmaker£55mBetter technical ceiling than Gallagher.Maghnes AklioucheLeft Winger/10£50mMore creative than Yan Diomande.Antonee RobinsonLeft Back£35mMore reliable than a 19-year-old from Brazil.
Click to expand...

Akliouche is definitely a right winger, so good to see it's as accurate as it is with its other nonsense.
 
Bullet said:
In the words of David Gedge, "It's getting better all the time".
Each version of AI gets steadily better and better.
But remember, you are never asking AI for a truthful expert answer to a question, you are asking AI to create the sort of answer someone might expect to get from an expert i.e. it will fabricate links and text to create something approximating the sort of answer one might expect.

Whereas 18 months ago I asked AI what the historic scores were for Spurs v Liverpool and it made the whole list of scores up, including several years into the future!
Click to expand...

It can't get that much better. It's only capable of giving statistical averages of it's training data. So it will always be - at best - average. And it's training data is getting worse, as it's now training on its own hallucinations.
 
Gutter Boy said:
It can't get that much better. It's only capable of giving statistical averages of it's training data. So it will always be - at best - average. And it's training data is getting worse, as it's now training on its own hallucinations.
Click to expand...
Disagree. It doesn't give statistical averages, it calculates what a good answer might be. The algorithms are progressing fast, and the processing power is progressing faster. Off topic.
 
Bullet said:
In the words of David Gedge, "It's getting better all the time".
Each version of AI gets steadily better and better.
But remember, you are never asking AI for a truthful expert answer to a question, you are asking AI to create the sort of answer someone might expect to get from an expert i.e. it will fabricate links and text to create something approximating the sort of answer one might expect.

Whereas 18 months ago I asked AI what the historic scores were for Spurs v Liverpool and it made the whole list of scores up, including several years into the future!
Click to expand...

I've never used it, but the examples I've seen of friends using it it is giving them the answer it thinks they want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back