• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

American politics

Yep and I have done a search on why the use of the data by NVICs and subsequent reporting and every reputable report says their interpretation of the data should not be trusted.

None of what they present is scientific verified causation, they have also famously double counted data.

There are also doubts based on self reporting on VAERS and can be coincidental, and lack confirmed medical verification.

So no, I won't be trusting their use of data. I think your wife might have jumped the gun quiting her job if you took medical prompts from them. US medical loss is Burger Kings gain though I suppose

Back with the insults when he has lost the arguement. The tried and tested strategy. And all it is is a deflection from the actual discussion on the false reporting of measles deaths in PA.
 
Indeed. Some people shoot their mouths off without consideration for context. Or details. Either that, or they simply enjoy aggravating others. Whichever way you slice it, poor form.

Knowing of NVIC and their history because it featured on a BBC doc here, it only took me 5 mins to find their website had been totally discredited. Founded by an absolute nut job and one of the associated misinformation groups with Childrens Health Defence which to my shock was chaired by who???? Yep you guessed it................................RFK

You could not write the

Rob trying to give evidence that he is not a conspiracy theory Maga nut and he is providing data from organisations who are absolutely that.

At least its given me a giggle and something to laugh at tonight, utterly mental.
 
You got multiple boosters. You’ve spoken about that in conversation with me. Why is that something I cannot reference as an example of people taking Covid more seriously than others?

I've spoken about it with everyone. And said more. Unless you are genuinely clueless when you write, and do not understand your own presentation, then you are being dishonest as to the inference of your post. It would've been easy to say the same thing without a name. Do what you like but you're not doing it for free,
 
Knowing of NVIC and their history because it featured on a BBC doc here, it only took me 5 mins to find their website had been totally discredited. Founded by an absolute nut job and one of the associated misinformation groups with Childrens Health Defence which to my shock was chaired by who???? Yep you guessed it................................RFK

You could not write the

Rob trying to give evidence that he is not a conspiracy theory Maga nut and he is providing data from organisations who are absolutely that.

At least its given me a giggle and something to laugh at tonight, utterly mental.

You asked for the VAERS data and I provided it to you.
 
Back with the insults when he has lost the arguement. The tried and tested strategy. And all it is is a deflection from the actual discussion on the false reporting of measles deaths in PA.

Mate you used a conspiracy theory website to try and claim you are not a conspiracy theory nutter. A site that has one of the lowest trust ratings on the internet.

I make no apology for my comments, if your "woe be me" story about your wifes job was influenced by misinformation then you both only have yourselves to blame sorry to say
 
I've spoken about it with everyone. And said more. Unless you are genuinely clueless when you write, and do not understand your own presentation, then you are being dishonest as to the inference of your post. It would've been easy to say the same thing without a name. Do what you like but you're not doing it for free,

You know what that is fair. I apologise for bringing your name up directly.
 
Mate you used a conspiracy theory website to try and claim you are not a conspiracy theory nutter. A site that has one of the lowest trust ratings on the internet.

I make no apology for my comments, if your "woe be me" story about your wifes job was influenced by misinformation then you both only have yourselves to blame sorry to say

I provided you exactly what you requested.
 
You asked for the VAERS data and I provided it to you.

And that data does not say the people died specifically of the MMR vaccination. I have explained that point already in response to the NVIC interpretation of the data.

But again for clarification there are also doubts based on self reporting on VAERS and can be coincidental, and lack confirmed medical verification.
 
And that data does not say the people died specifically of the MMR vaccination. I have explained that point already in response to the NVIC interpretation of the data.

But again for clarification there are also doubts based on self reporting on VAERS and can be coincidental, and lack confirmed medical verification.

I never said it would state that. The med alert site which I suspect you’ve not even looked at, just googled whether it’s somehting you can make a judgement on, takes the VAERS data and puts it in an easy to read format. It also cuts out the bulk of the reports which get dismissed.

NVIC provided a link to med alert which is the VAERS data.

You can see some where the death is directly related to recieving the MMR and other where it’s associated to differing scales. The unreliable data is not in the link I sent you which you have chosen not to read.

Still all this is is a deflection from the false reporting on the 2 measles deaths in PA yesterday.
 
Still all this is is a deflection from the false reporting on the 2 measles deaths in PA yesterday.
Its not, its an example of the hypocrisy that I spoke of.

You are taking your prompts where data without medical proof or confirmation has been provided and conflated with coincidence to claim deaths by MMR vaccine. The absolute came thing you have complained about.

NVIC is a conspiracy theory website, founded by a well known conspiracy theorist, thats just an absolute fact of life. The fact you posted them shows where you are taking your so called medical knowledge from and proves you yourself are a conspiracy nutter.

Honestly flabbergasted that you would even post a link from NVIC when you have spent near all day claiming to not be a nutter.
 
Its not, its an example of the hypocrisy that I spoke of.

You are taking your prompts where data without medical proof or confirmation has been provided and conflated with coincidence to claim deaths by MMR vaccine. The absolute came thing you have complained about.

NVIC is a conspiracy theory website, founded by a well known conspiracy theorist, thats just an absolute fact of life. The fact you posted them shows where you are taking your so called medical knowledge from and proves you yourself are a conspiracy nutter.

Honestly flabbergasted that you would even post a link from NVIC when you have spent near all day claiming to not be a nutter.

How many times do I need to explain this. The NVIC page was a link to Med Alert which is a more user friendly version of the VAERS database, which I also linked.
 
It doesn't explain your assertion. At all. And you probably don't have a clue what you are trying to assert anymore on this thread.

None of them states those babies died of the vaccine. Herein lies the problem, coincidence over causation being reported as certain deaths by websites run by nutters.

Ironically nutters making loads of money off thick gullible cnuts. Buy yeh, when its Big Pharma making money....boo
 
Back